We can divide aviation audits into two broad categories:
A compliance audit searches for conformance for a series of rules. However, it is not compulsory for the rules to be interpreted as questions.
On the other hand, if we talk about regulatory audits, then they are like compliance audits – with EASA regulatory needs. Its subparts and main parts are a good example.
When we talk about some particular areas of business, these kinds of areas exist most in aviation, and they can be described as a high risk. For these particular activities, audits play a huge role, in order to create a smooth connection with the company’s processes.
What is the difference between conformance and compliance?
Conformance is related to a standard form of a particular function for instance.
On the other hand, when it comes to compliance, then there is a higher level of understanding required to get involved in the delivery processes of the product.
Compliance audits are made to make sure that all of the activities of a system are performed thoroughly and effectively. In other words, compliance audits are off course hasty. They are also subjective in “pass or fail” terms. So, compliance audits require a low level of competence.
The audit is served as a complete checklist of noted conditions. It is important for one to understand the fact that inspection type auditing cannot be done without its shortcomings. But, when we talk about the flaws, then the major downfall of a compliance audit is that it does not check the processes selected to perform the delivery. So, as an outcome, most of the assumptions are performed on the behalf of the assessor.
It is up to the management to perform annual reviews, but the detail that is most required to be subjective is not always accessible.
This doesn’t turn out to be such an issue, but it is still a weakness. One can find compensation for compliance audits in the process audits of in the system. On the other hand, the system can be disturbed by the compliance audits. Compliance is responsible for making the delivery of the organization unquestionable.
On the other hand, a performance audit considers the effectiveness of the organization. A performance audit is aware of the fact that not everything is perfect, for instance, an organization does whatever they can to make the resources available, but there are still some shortcomings.
Rules become challenged in a performance audit. The principles that are running those rules are not disturbed, but they are accepted the way they are. Performance auditing is totally different from compliance auditing. The rules of aviation safety auditing are actually considered. For more details about the aviation safety auditing you can go right here for a better information.
Performance audit requires a complete understanding of the area that is controlling the system. It also searches for the several ways that can be used to achieve perfection and get a load of those controls. Considering the safety of the system is also a huge part done by performance audits.